Wuthering Heights Symbols - 886 Words

Wuthering Heights: A Critical Guide to the Novel Landscape †¢ Emily Bronte: landscape near her home in Yorkshire †¢ Strange, isolated world where passions of all kinds run deep †¢ Isolated farmhouse †¢ Not only the setting of the novel, but the nature of the people and their occupations and obsessions †¢ Earth, air, water. Wrestling trees, changing skies, rocks, wild flowers †¢ Doorstep of the parsonage: the graveyard, wraps around the house on two sides †¢ Death was a familiar visitor: Emily lost her mother and two older sisters at age 7 †¢ Death is a major image and pre-occupation of Wuthering Heights Emily Brontes Life †¢ Borne as the 5th child to the Reverend and Cornish wife †¢ Emily was 3 years old when her mother died of cancer†¦show more content†¦o The windows of Thrashwood Grange, first saw the Linton family through it. o Catherines death: number of references to her sitting at the window. Nelly leaves the window open so that Heathcliff can come in. o Windows then symbolizes barrier which separates characters from eachother and their hopes/desires. o The open window suggests the attempt to reach what is unreachable, or the moments of attainment. †¢ Doors and Gates o Locking people in and out of the places. o The doors and gates lock characters in and out of the places. †¢ Animal images: o Catherine calls Isabella a tigress o Heathcliff is tiger, venomous serpent o Fierced dogs of the Wuthering Heights, reinforces the fierce nature. o Animals represents the power. †¢ Books: o Suggestions of power. Escape. Freedom and self-realization o Books as a symbol of refusal of submission o Hareton knew reading books will bring her closer to Cathy. Styles: †¢ Lockwood uses an educated and artificial language. Long sentences with numerous clauses, often marked byShow MoreRelatedWuthering Heights Essays1651 Words   |  7 PagesWuthering Heights In the first chapter of the book the reader gets a vivid picture of the house Wuthering Heights from Lockwoods descriptions wuthering being a significant provincial adjective, descriptive of the atmospheric tumult to which its station is exposed in stormy weather. It quickly becomes clear that Wuthering Heights portrays the image of its surroundings, the desolate Yorkshire moors fully exposed to the elements. It is not only the houseRead MorePlot in England in the Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte709 Words   |  3 Pagessurrounding Wuthering Heights is based in England. A man named Lockwood rents a manor house in an isolated part of England. Lockwood asks the house keeper Nelly Dean to tell him Heathcliff’s story. It important to note this part of the story because the tale that Nelly tells Lockwood will become the story line for Wuthering Heights. In the tale the Earnshaw children do not like Heathcliff because of his dark skin. When the father of the children die Earnshaw’s son Hindley inherits Wuthering HeightsRead MoreGood vs. Evil in Wuthering Heights638 Words   |  3 Pagesnovel to illuminate certain values and principles in their writing. In Wuthering Heights, Emily Bronte utilizes this technique to enhance the theme of the work. The novel is set in a harsh environment in Northern England, highlighting two specific estates, Wuthering Heights and Thrushc ross Grange, as the main places of action. The dreary landscape and houses not only serve as the primary setting, but also as major symbols that aide in establishing the tone and enhancing the novels theme of goodRead MoreWuthering Heights By Emily Bronte1555 Words   |  7 Pages2015 Wuthering Heights (1847) by Emily Brontà « Introduction The novel Wuthering Heights was written in 1847 by Emily Brontà «. The plot unravels with Lockwood visiting his landlord at Wuthering Heights; as Lockwood stays the night, he starts to discover items within the home and later a fatal vision appears, which causes him great curiosity. Lockwood returns back to his residence at Thrushcross Granges and listens to the history of his landlord, Heathcliff; told by an old servant at Wuthering HeightsRead MoreAnalysis Of Emily Bronte s Wuthering Heights 1408 Words   |  6 Pagesbriefly seen as a narrator, she and Lockwood have various similarities in their styles and traits. Their similarities begin through their experiences, which serve as a basis for their narration. Both characters have horrible first impressions of Wuthering Heights. Lockwood’s was through being attacked by dogs, treated rudely, and being haunted by Catherine’s ghost. Isabella’s was by being treated badly and disrespectfully by her new husband, Heathcliff. They both chose to write about it, as well, LockwoodRead MoreThe Importance of the Setting in Wuthering Heights Essay1613 Words   |  7 PagesThe Importance of the Setting in Wuthering Heights There are numerous approaches to analyzing and understanding a novel, with the setting being one of utmost importance. It is one of the first aspects noted by readers because it can potentially increase their identification of specific motifs, and subsequently themes, through repetitively emphasizing the natural setting that penetrates conversations, incidences, thoughts, and behaviors. The author typically creates a setting that facilitatesRead MoreAnalysis Of Emily Bronte s Wuthering Heights Essay1059 Words   |  5 Pages1. Title of Work: Wuthering Heights 2. Author and date Written: Emily Bronte author of Wuthering Heights wrote the book between October 1845 and June 1846 3. Country of Author: Emily Bronte was born in Thornton, Yorkshire, England, on July 30, 1818 4. Characters (Major and Minor): Heatchliff: Dark-Skinned: they describe him as dark-skinned Cruel: Because he uses his son to get vengeance against young Catherine Catherine: Is Hindley sister and Mr. Ms. Earnshaw daughter Mean: because knowing sheRead MoreAnalysis Of Emily Bronte s Wuthering Heights Essay1066 Words   |  5 PagesGiovanni Rosas P.4 AP ENGLISH BOOK REPORT 1. Title of Work: Wuthering Heights 2. Author and date Written: Emily Bronte author of Wuthering Heights wrote the book between October 1845 and June 1846 3. Country of Author: Emily Bronte was born in Thornton, Yorkshire, England, on July 30, 1818 4. Characters (Major and Minor): Heatchliff: Dark-Skinned: they describe him as dark-skinned Cruel: Because he uses his son to get vengeance against young Catherine Catherine: Is Hindley sister andRead MoreEmily Brontes Wuthering Heights Essay983 Words   |  4 PagesEmily Brontes Wuthering Heights 1. What techniques are used in the characterization of Heathcliff? Effects? Heathcliff is associated with evil and darkness from the beginning of the novel. I felt his black eyes withdraw so suspiciously under their brows. (1) When LockwoodRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Character Names In Wuthering Heights1654 Words   |  7 Pagesstory to. It is her explanation to him that the readers learn about most of the events that occurred at Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross Grange. Heathcliff, a mild-mannered owner of Wuthering Heights, has a relationship with Catherine that demonstrates how class distinctions dictated romantic life and life in general in the 18th and 19th century. Joseph, a grumpy servant at Wuthering Heights, is the only of the few objective character throughout the story, as he hates everyone nearly equal. Hindley

The Case Analysis Of The And Childress s Principles Of...

What is the duty of a healthcare provider when treating patients who do not comply with treatment plans and medication regimens? Noncompliance is most often an issue with diagnoses that are multifactorial, requiring life style changes and numerous medications (Blackburn, Swidrovich, Lemstra, 2013, p. 183 ). One of the most common patient populations to fall within this noncompliant classification is type 2 diabeticspatient with Type 2 diabetes, resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality (Blackburn, Swidrovich, Lemstra, 2013). As a medical doctor taking care ofProviding care for noncompliant patients can be a real ethical challengepresent ethical challenges as healthcare providers, especially primary care clinicians, struggle to decide whether or not to continue to treat a patient who seeks but does not follow medical advice. Using Beauchamp and Childress’s Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2009) to analyze the case analysis of the a noncompliant patient, Ms. C, will a llows an in in-depth look into the many facets of resolving the moral dilemma to treat or not to treat the patient (Appendix A ). Background Diabetic patients in the United States make up the second most common noncompliant patient population resulting in an astounding number of unnecessary hospitalizations costing upwards of $100 billion per year in medical costs (Senst , Achusim, Genest, et al., 2001). To have a better appreciation for adult onset diabetes it is important to know the basics ofShow MoreRelatedA Careful and Meaningful Consideration of my Journey in Nursing Ethics1614 Words   |  7 Pagesthat swarm our lives. Critical Reflection Analysis has not only become to me a safe haven and comforting refuge, but also a resort that showcases the function of reason and knowledge in understanding the complex nature of relationship that exist between the Healthcare System, the patient, and the Healthcare provider. For a safe and effective nursing practice, a proper knowledge and understanding of nursing code of ethics, the definitions, concepts and principles of all stakeholders need to be recognizedRead MoreEthical Dilemma And Ethical Dilemmas Essay2358 Words   |  10 Pagesis good for the patient are both acceptable professionally and ethical. The choice as to which course of action is best to take is very personal and moral (Natale, 2012). In the case study, the stakeholders are Elsie, family members of Elsie, Paramedic, and RAC facility and register nurse. The interested parties in the case scenario have the interest in whatever transpired in the health facility. For instance, Elsie had informed her family members that she did not require aggressive treatment and didRead MoreIn Jordan, A 2-Month-Old Infant, Sameer, Came To The Pediatrics2355 Words   |  10 Pagesnot vaccinate their child. The ethics of this case turns on as the physician believes that vaccination is necessary to increase the child immunity and to avoid the serious and irreversible harm or even death that may be caused by diseases, if the child is not vaccinated, and his moral obligation to protect community; while parents believes that it is their right to refuse vaccination to protect child from complication caused by the vaccine itself. Though, the case is ethically important because itRead MoreWhy Vaccination Is Necessary For Children2736 Words   |  11 Pagesnot vaccinate their child. The ethics of this case turns on as the physician believes that vaccination is necessary to increase the child’s immunity and to avoid the serious and irreversible harm or even death that may be caused by diseases, if the child is not vaccinated, and his moral obligation to protect the community; while parents believes that it is their right to refuse vaccination to protect child from complication caused by the vaccine itself. Though, the case is ethically important becauseRead MoreThe Legal And Ethical Obligation Confidentiality Of Hiv Related Information Exist886 Words   |  4 Pagesmaintain the confidentiality of HIV-related information exist. For example, health care providers in the U.S. have a duty to report HIV infections and AIDS cases to public health authorities. The benefits to the public health of this reporting are felt to outweigh the risk to individuals. Reporting of AIDS cases has always included the patient s name and other identifying information. Although reporting of HIV infections initially was not done by name, there has been a recent and controversial movementRead MoreCase Analysis : Whose Pain Is It Anyway?3115 Words   |  13 Pages Case Analysis: Whose Pain is it Anyway? GNUR 6058: Ethics Fall 2014 Abigail Evans University of Virginia School of Nursing Approx grade: 91 Overall 20 Dilemma 10 Framework 10 Bkgrnd 10 Analysis 20 Conclusions 10 Org 5 Grammar 5 APA 5 Case 5 18 10 8.5 10 16 8.5 4.5 5 4.5 5 On my honor, I have neither given nor received assistance on this paper. AEE. Introduction In the case of â€Å"Whose Pain is it Anyway?† Mr. T is admitted to the orthopedic unit after an open reduction of a fracturedRead MoreEuthanasia: The Case of Susan Wolfs Father1150 Words   |  5 PagesThe modified mental state in question here brings to mind the pain the Susans farther was going through in illness. This pain can cause one to despair and come up with ideas that are not in line with expectations. This can be considered to be the case for Susans father and Susan herself. For Susans father, he was tired of going through the pain and pain reliving medication. Susan on the other hand, was hurting to see the father go through so much pain and agony. A mere suggestion of assistedRead MoreEthical Dilema2954 Words   |  12 PagesCase study Nursing Ethics 19(4) 581–589  ª The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav 10.1177/0969733012448348 nej.sagepub.com Pediatric consent: Case study analysis using a principles approach Adaorah NU Azotam Villanova University, USA Abstract This article will explore pediatric consent through the analysis of a clinical case study using the principles of biomedical ethics approach. Application of the principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficenceRead MoreInternational Nursing Ethics1550 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿Case study During his studies at university Leon took a casual position as a carer in the local nursing home. At the end of the first week he was employed a colleague invited him to attend afternoon tea with a group of nursing colleagues. At the gathering they all brought out their mobile phones and shared photos they had taken of the elderly residents genitals during the week. There was a competition to guess who the genitals belonged to. Leon was invited to join this group and participate inRead MoreUsing the Eight Ethical Decision Model in a Case Study1645 Words   |  7 Pagesdecision model. Using the 8 ethical decision model to arrive at my recommendation Identify the problem: Nurses are supposed to take great pains with ensuring patient privacy and with according them respect and honor. The practitioners in the case history mistreated the patients and as a MOH spokesperson observed: This should not have happened. There should have been tighter supervision of staff rendering care to vulnerable patients. More so, their attitude and behavior reflects surrounding

Critical Observation Paper Essay Example For Students

Critical Observation Paper Essay The study of social psychology in the behavioral observation of a crying infant. Abstract An infant crying is a behavioral trait of all new born babies. An infants first instinct when born is to cry. Why do infants cry? When infants cry it can be for a various amount of reasons. As a parent it is their responsibility to figure out what is wrong and keep the infant from crying. This paper provides awareness of why infants may cry and what one can do toprevent this. Critical Observation PaperSubject A being the parent was observing subject B being the infant. Subject A observes that subject B cries for various reasons. When aninfant expresses a need to cry it is the parents responsibility to find outwhy they are crying. A primary trait of infants is to cry when they wantto communicate their needs and discomforts that require some attention. The parent primarily needs to make sure the infant is not in any pain ordiscomfort that requires any medical attention. Once that is accomplishedits all about trial and error. Infants who cry excessively may have gastrointestinal problems which,is a form of abdominal pain (Illingworth 1954). This form of abdominalpain is called colic which is a crying behavior in infants (Illingworth1954). During these crying episodes parents need to be more attentive andloving to the infant. Calmly acknowledging and accepting their feelingsmay be what the infant needs. When infants cry it may be difficult to know why they are crying. There are many ways to find out why the infant is indeed crying. Forexample, subject B is crying and subject A feeds the infant. The infant isnot crying anymore. Now subject A realizes the reason the infants wascrying was because it was hungry. Some methods to try when an infant iscrying is to rock or simply try to distract the infant with singing ortalking etc. MethodNaturalistic Observation is the best method used in this situationsince the subject is an infant. This observation method operates well whenusing it on infants because it prevents any abuse or forcing them to cryfor an observation. Using this method for the reason that researchers canobserve how infants react in the natural setting. For instance, aninfants reaction to their mother leaving the room in their own home wouldbe different to a mother leaving the room in a strangers home. Gathering information on why infants cry, the researcher chooses tostudy a large group of infants rather than an individual infant. Forinstance, an individual infant that is chosen could be a special case andbe an infant who has colic, diaper rash, or an ear infection. The infantwho has colic, diaper rash, or an ear infection is going to cry more thanthe infants that do not. The group method can increase the results of theobservation because more than one infant is being used for the observation. In order for the research to be impartial, this observation consistedof more than one observer. Therefore, the research could be compared andwould not be one sided. This method would ensure that the researcher is notmaking an opinion of the observation rather than a general view. Theinfants would also be monitored by video, so that the observation can beviewed in different perspectives. The researchers would in additionrandomly pick infants for the observation. Case in point, picking infantsfrom different parts of the country would prevent the observation frombeing prejudice because the infants are different ethnic backgrounds. Inthe observation the infants would be treated equally and attend to theirneeds in the same way. Essay About Edmunds Corrugated Parts & ServicesThese methods would increase the observation to be accurate andtruthful. The Naturalistic observation method can be a predicament. Theonly way to make an observation is for the infant to be crying. Since theinfant can not be influenced in anyway the researcher has to wait for theinfant to go through an emotion. ResultCrying is an infants way to communicate to their parents or others. When infants cry they are communicating to have their needs taken cared ofand acknowledged. An infant who is crying because their diaper needs to bechanged gets their diaper changed, an infant who is hungry gets fed, and aninfant who is sleepy gets put down to sleep. These are all ways to solveinfants needs when they cry.Overall, the one reason infants cry is theywant to feel the love and embrace of the parents arms. Most infants justwant to be held, to feel the security and safety of their parents. ReferenceAldrich, C.A.; Sung, C.; And Knop, C. (1945). The Crying of Newly BornBabies, II: The Individual Phase. Journal of Pediatrics. RetrievedSeptember 19, 2004, from WebCo-HostAlter, M. (1981). When Cries. Do What? Mothering. Brazelton, T. B. (1962). Crying in Infancy. Pediatrics. RetrievedSeptember 19, 2004, from WebCo-HostIllingworth, R. (1954). Three-months Colic. Archive of the Disease ofChildhood. 29, 165-170. Wood, S.E.; Wood Green, E.; Boyd, D. (2004). Mastering the World ofPsychology

Volcano Mount Vesuvius Essays - Volcanology, Mount Somma

Volcano Mount Vesuvius Mount Vesuvius is a volcano located in southern Italy, near the bay of Naples and the city of Naples. It is the only active volcano on the European mainland. Vesuvius rises to a height of 1277 m (4190 ft). Vesuvio (Vesuvius) is probably the most famous volcano on earth, and is one of the most dangerous. Mount Vesuvius is a strato-volcano consisting of a volcanic cone (Gran Cono) that was built within a summit caldera (Mount Somma). The Somma-Vesuvius complex has formed over the last 25,000 years by means of a sequence of eruptions of variable explosiveness, ranging from the quiet lava outpourings that characterized much of the latest activity (for example from 1881 to 1899 and from 1926 to 1930) to the explosive Plinian eruptions, including the one that destroyed Pompeii and killed thousands of people in 79 A.D. At least seven Plinian eruptions have been identified in the eruptive history of Somma-Vesuvius (1). Each was preceded by a long period of stillness, which in the case of the 79 A.D. eruption lasted about 700 years. These eruptions were fed by viscous water-rich phonotitic to tephritic phonolitic magmas that appear to have differentiated in shallow crustal conditions. They are believed to have slowly filled a reservoir where differentiation was driven by compositional convection. A minimum depth of about 3 km was inferred for the top of the magmatic reservoir from mineral equilibria of metamorphic carbonate ejecta (2). Fluid inclusions ([CO.sub.2] and [H.sub.2]O-[CO.sub.2]) in clinopyroxenes from cumulate and nodules indicate a trapping pressure of 1.0 to 2.5 kbar at about 1200 [degrees]C, suggesting that these minerals crystallized at depths of 4 to 10 km (3). The differentiated magma fraction was about 30% of the total magma in the reservoir, and a volume of about 2 to 3 [km.sup.3] was inferred for the reservoir (4). The magma ascent to the surface occurred through a conduit of possibly 70 to 100 m in diameter (5). A thermal model predicts that such a reservoir should contain a core of partially molten magma (6) that can be detected by high-resolution seismic tomography. The earliest outcropping volcanic deposits date back to about 25,000 years ago. The lavas observed at a -1125 m bore-hole are about 0,3-0,5 million years old. It is known for the first eruption of which an eyewitness account is preserved, in 79 AD. Geologically, Vesuvio is unique for its unusual versatility. Its activity ranging from Hawaiian-style release of liquid lava, fountaining and lava lakes, over Strombolian and Vulcanian activity to violently explosive, plinian events that produce pyroclastic flows and surges. Vesuvius is a complex volcano. A complex volcano is "an extensive assemblage of spatially, temporally, and genetically related major and minor [volcanic] centers with there associated lava flows and pyroclastic flows." Vesuvius has a long history. The oldest dated rock from the volcano is about 300,000 years old. It was collected from a well drilled near the volcano and was probably part of the Somma volcano. After Somma collapsed about 17,000 years ago, Vesuvius began to form. Four types of eruption have been documented: a) Plinian (AD 79, Pompeii type) events with widespread air fall and major pyroclastic surges and flows; b) sub-Plinian to Plinian, more moderately sized eruptions (AD 472, 1631) with heavy tephra falls around the volcano and pyroclastic flows and surges; c) small to medium-sized, Strombolian to Vulcanian eruptions (numerous events during the 1631-1944 cycle, such as 1906 and 1944) with local heavy tephra falls and major lava flows and small pyroclastic avalanches restricted to the active cone itself. The fourth type it is the smallest of all eruption types observed at Vesuvio. It is the persistent Strombolian to Hawaiian style eruption that characterizes almost all of an eruptive sub-cycle, such as was the case during the period 1913-1944. Activity of this kind is mainly restricted to the central crater where one or more intracrateral cones form, and to the sides of the cone. Lava flows from the summit crater or from the sub terminal vents extend beyond the cone's base. A somewhat particular kind of persistent activity is the slow release of large amounts of lava from sub terminal fractures to form thick piles of lava with little lateral extension, such as the lava cupola of Colle Umberto, formed in 1895-1899. (7) Vesuvius lies over a subduction zone. The two plates are the African plate and the Eurasian plate. The African plate is moving northward at about one inch (2-3 cm) per year and is slowly closing the Mediterranean basin. As it moves to the north, the

Space meets knowledge The impact of workplace design On knowledge sharing  The WritePass Journal

Space meets knowledge The impact of workplace design On knowledge sharing ï » ¿ Abstract Space meets knowledge The impact of workplace design On knowledge sharing ï » ¿ ). International companies are recognizing this same value of face to face interaction as the social interaction between management sections, benefits production and development levels world-wide (Noorderhaven and Harzing 2009). In their discussion of social capital, Cohen and Prusak (2001) emphasise the importance of the physical workplace for the exchanging of knowledge, specifically the distribution of ideas amongst individuals in a situation where they could not assume that others knew what they were required to know. Becker (2004) hypothesises that the choices an organisation makes about how space is allocated and designed directly and indirectly shapes the infrastructure of knowledge networks – the dense and richly veined social systems that help people learn faster and engage more deeply in the work of the organisation. This corresponds with the Dakir (2012) argument that technology is no substitute for live interaction among the members of the organization. Davenport et al (2002) undertook a study among 41 firms that were implementing initiatives to advance the performance of high-end knowledge workers who were regarded as critical to the company’s aims. They focused upon determining th e elements that affected the knowledge work performance. Surprisingly, the issue that was most frequently dealt with by these firms involved the physical workplace – â€Å"the other common ones were information technology and management† (Davenport 2005, p. 166). Davenport (2005) emphasises that the recognition of the importance of knowledge work has grown in recent years, but that our understanding of the physical conditions in which knowledge can flourish has failed to keep pace. The inclusion of emerging communication technology has been argued to provide a better opportunity for employee interaction (Rhoads 2010). This same element of improved long distance communication is credited with diminishing the valued impromptu inspiration that many firms rely on during day to day operations (Denstadli, Gripsrud, Hjortahol and Julsrud 2013). According to Davenport et al (2002) workplace design should be seen as a key determinant of knowledge-worker performance, while we largely remain in the dark about how to align ‘space’ to the demands of knowledge work. Davenport (2005) emphasises the point that â€Å"there is a good deal said about the topic, but not much known about it† (p. 165). Most of the decisions concerning the clima te in which work takes place have been created without consideration for performance factors. This fact continues to diminish opportunities for in-house knowledge sharing and effective dissemination of intelligence (Denstadli et al 2013). Becker (2004) points out that the cultivation of knowledge networks underpins the continuing debate about office design, and the relative virtue of open versus closed space. Duffy (2000) confirms these views when he admits that early twenty-first-century architects â€Å"currently know as little about how workplaces shapes business performance as early nineteenth-century physicians knew how diseases were transmitted before the science of epidemiology was established† (p. 371). This makes every emerging decision regarding effective knowledge sharing critical to the development of any organisation. Deprez and Tissen (2009) illustrate the strength of the knowledge sharing process using Google’s approach:   Ã¢â‚¬Å"one company that is fully aware of its ‘spatial’ capabilities†. The spatial arrangements at Google’s offices can serve as a useful example of how design can have a bearing on improving the exchange of knowledge in ways that also add value to the company. The Zurich ‘Google engineering’ office is the company’s newest and largest research and development facility besides Mountain View, California. In this facility, Deprez and Tissen (2009) report: â€Å"Google has created workspaces where people literally ‘slide into space’ (i.e. the restaurant). Its really true: Google Is different. It’s in the design; it’s in the air and in the spirit of the ‘place’. It’s almost organizing without management. A workplace becomes a ‘workspace’, mobilizing the collective Goo gle minds and link them to their fellow ‘Zooglers’ inside the Zurich office and to access all the outside/external knowledge to be captured by the All Mighty Google organisation† (2009, p. 37). What works for one organisation may not work for another and this appears to be the case in particular when it comes to Google (Deprez et al 2009). Yet, some valuable lessons in how the workplace can be used to good effect can be gained from Google’s operations. For this precise reason, research was carried out at Google Zurich to provide both theoretical and managerial insights into the impact of the design and use of the physical workplace on knowledge sharing (Ibid). Studies comparing the performance of virtual and co-located teams found that virtual teams tend to be more task oriented and exchange less social information than co located ones (Walther Burgoon 1992; Chidambaram 1996). The researchers suggest this would slow the development of relationships and strong relational links have been shown to enhance creativity and motivation. Other studies conclude that face-to-face team meetings are usually more effective and satisfying than virtual ones, but nevertheless virtual teams can be as effective if given sufficient time to develop strong group relationships (Chidambaram 1996). This research implies the importance of facilitating social interaction in the workplace, and between team members (virtual and co-located) when the team is initially forming. Hua (2010) proposes that repeated encounters, even without conversation, help to promote the awareness of co-workers and to foster office relationships. McGrath (1990) recommends that in the abse nce of the ability to have an initial face-to-face meeting other avenues for building strong relationships are advised to ensure the cohesiveness and effectiveness of the team’s interaction. So although interaction alone is not a sufficient condition for successful collaboration, it does indirectly support collaboration. Nova (2005) points out that physical proximity allow the use of non verbal communication including: different paralinguistic and non-verbal signs, precise timing of cues, coordination of turn-taking or the repair of misunderstandings. Psychologists note that deictic references are used in face-to-face meetings on a regular basis, which refers to pointing, looking, touching or gesturing to indicate a nearby object mentioned in conversation (Ibid). Newlands et al (2002) analysed interactions of two groups performing a joint task in either face-to-face or a video conference system. They found that deictic hand gesture occurred five times more frequently in the face-to-face condition the virtual interaction. More recent research has found that extroverts gesticulate for longer and more often in meetings than introverts (Jonnson 2006). Barbour and Koneya (1976) famously claimed that 55 per cent of communication is non-verbal communication, 38 per cent is done by tone of voice, and only 7 per cent is related to the words and content. Clearly non-verbal communication is a key component of interaction and virtual interaction systems need to replicate this basic need, especially in the early stages of team forming or when the team consists of a high proportion of extroverts. The physical co-location of teams also facilitates collaboration (Ibid). A seminal piece of research carried out by Allen (1977) demonstrated that the probability of two people communicating in an organisation is inversely proportional to the distance separating them, and it is close to zero after 30 metres of physical separation. Furthermore, proximity helps maintain task and group awareness, because when co-located it is easier to gather and update information about the task performed by team members (Dakir 2012). A recent survey of workers at highly collaborative companies found that most â€Å"collaborative events† are short (with 34% lasting fewer than 15 minutes) and the majority take place at the desk (Green 2012). It is likely that these impromptu interactions relate to sharing information (perhaps on the PC) or answering queries rather than lengthy intense discussion and development of joint ideas. Interactions at desks may facilitate tacit knowledge sharing by overhearing relevant conversations between team members, but such interactions can also be considered a distraction if not relevant (Denstadli et al 2013). Methodology There are two acknowledged methodological approaches: quantitative and qualitative (Creswell 2005). The quantitative method involves identifying variables in a research question which are then utilized in order to collate numerical data (Ibid).   The qualitative research is open to interpretation allowing personal answers to be incorporated into the study (Creswell 2005). The researcher considered both options in order to complete the necessary goals. Types of Data There are two forms of data: primary, or newly generated data, or secondary, previous data generated within existing studies (Creswell 2005). This study required the acquisition of primary data creating the need for relevant instruments. A survey with 5 open-ended questions has been created and subsequently conducted with centred on 548 employees working at Google Zurich.   This was done in order to explore the perceptions of Google employees with regard to the environment in which they work with a focus on factors that affect knowledge sharing in the work environment. Methods of Data Collection The qualitative data analysis employed a Content Analysis technique to reveal participant perceptions of their work environment. The survey questions were designed to explore employee perceptions regarding the following dimensions: 1) Activities that allow for increased exchange of knowledge; 2) Advantages of frequent interaction with colleagues; 3) Individuals or groups dependent on the frequent interaction with co-workers or  Ã‚   group members; 4) Factors that facilitate interaction within the workplace 5) Factors that inhibit interaction with others in the workplace. Survey participants responded to five open-ended questions and rated their answers using a five-point Likert scale where 5 was ‘most important’. Using a Content Analysis approach (Creswell 2005; Leedy and Ormrod 2005; Neuendorf 2002), the interview responses were analysed. Content Analysis is a qualitative data reduction method that generates categories from key words and phrases in the interview text; it is an evidence-based process in which data gathered through an exploratory approach is systematically analysed to produce predictive or inferential intent (Creswell 2005). Content Analysis was used to identify themes or common concepts in participants’ perceptions regarding the culturally and environmentally distinctive factors that affect interaction in the workplace (Neuendorf, 2002). This process permitted the investigator to quantify and analyse data so that inferences could be drawn. The Content Analysis of survey interview text was categorically coded to reflect various levels of analysis, including key components, words, sentences, or themes (Neuendorf 2002). These themes or key components were then examined using relational analysis to determine whether there were any relationships between the responses of the subjects. The analysis was conducted with Nvivo8 ® software which enables sorting, categorising, and frequency counts of invariant constituents (relevant responses). Content Analysis was used to critically evaluate the survey responses of the study participants, providing in-depth information regarding the factors related to workplace interaction. Sample Respondent Characteristics The invited population consisted of 675 individuals and a total of 548 individuals participated in the survey resulting in a response rate of 81 per cent. Of these 548 completed surveys, 35 responses were discarded because the respondents only partially completed the survey. The final sample consisted of 513 respondents. The key characteristics of these respondents are summarized in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Sample Respondent Characteristics Factor Description Frequency Education High School Bachelor Degree Certificate Degree Master Degree PhD Degree Other: 15 118 19 231 121 9 Tenure 2 years 2-5 years 5 years 153 331 29 Time Building Use 1 year 1 year 2 years 2 years 140 102 271 0 Time Desk Use 3 months 3-6 months 7-12 months 12 months 143 159 126 85 Age 20 years 21-30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years 50 years 0 216 255 35 7 Gender Male Female 428 85 Mobilty Zurich Office Other Google Office Home Office Travelling Other 88.9% 3.9% 3.9% 2.7% 0.5% Position Engineering Sales and Marketing GandA Other: 428 12 14 59 Nationality Germany Switzerland United States France Poland United Kingdom Romania Hungary Netherlands Sweden Spain Australia Russian Federation 10 respondents 73 62 35 33 28 27 24 23 17 16 14 13 12 136    Survey Findings In order to provide an audit trail of participant responses to the thematic categories that emerged from the data analysis, discussion of the findings precedes the tables of data, within a framework consisting of the five survey questions. An overall summary is provided at the conclusion of the discussion of findings. During the analysis of data, common invariant constituents (relevant responses) were categorically coded and associated frequencies were documented. Frequency data included overall frequency of occurrence as well as frequencies based on rating level (5 = most important to 1 = least important). Invariant constituents with a frequency of less than 10 were not included in the tables. Study conclusions were developed through an examination of the high frequency and highly rated invariant constituents in conjunction with the revealed thematic categories. Question 1: Main Activities that Allow Exchange of Knowledge Table 4-2 provides high frequency invariant constituents (relevant responses) by survey participants demonstrating themes within the data for Question 1. Thematically, the analysis revealed the following primary perceptions of participants in terms of main activities that allow knowledge exchange: (a) meetings of all types; (b) whiteboard area discussions; (c) video conferencing; (d) email, and (e) code reviews. These elements demonstrated a high frequency of importance ratings, and a moderate percentage of respondents rated these elements as ‘most important’ (rating 5). Other themes revealed through the analysis included the importance of writing and reading documentation, Instant Messaging (IM) text chat, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), and extracurricular/social activities. All other invariant constituents with a frequency of greater than 10 are shown in Table 4-2. Table 4-2 Data Analysis Results for Question 1: Main Activities Allowing for Exchange of Knowledge Invariant Constituent Overall number (Frequency) By Rating 5=Most important n=513 5 4 3 2 1 Informal discussion/face to face mtgs/stand ups 351 149 77 60 33 32 Formal planned meetings/conference room mtgs 218 40 61 56 38 23 Email 207 74 74 32 21 6 Lunches/Dinners 64 9 10 15 18 12 Whiteboard area discussions/brainstorming 58 22 13 10 9 4 Video Conferencing (VC) 58 4 16 20 14 4 Code Reviews 51 5 16 20 4 6 Writing/Reading Documentation 47 6 8 13 16 4 IM/Text Chat/IRC 46 10 16 10 7 3 â€Å"Extracurricular Activities† (e.g., pool, socializing, Friday office drinks, etc.) 45 2 2 15 10 16 Writing/Reading docs specifically wiki pages/sites 34 2 10 6 9 7 Chat (unspecified in person vs. text) 33 8 7 8 7 3 Techtalks 27 4 5 6 7 5 Training/presentations 23 1 3 3 10 6 Mailing lists 21 10 2 5 2 2 Shared docs/doc collaboration 17 0 3 5 5 4 Read/write design docs specifically 12 0 2 5 0 5 Telephone/phone conversations 12 0 3 2 4 3 Question 2: Main Advantages of Frequent Interaction with Colleagues Table 4-3 provides high frequency invariant constituents (relevant responses) by survey participants demonstrating themes within the data for Question 2. Thematically, the analysis revealed the following elements representing the primary perceptions of participants in terms of the main advantages to frequent interaction with colleagues: (a) knowledge and information exchange and transfer; (b) staying current on projects and processes; (c) social interaction; (d) learning from others; (e) faster problem resolution; (f) efficient collaboration; and (g) continuous and early feedback. The following themes received a high frequency of importance ratings and a large percentage of ‘most important’ and ‘important’ ratings (rating 5 and 4, respectively) included: knowledge sharing, staying in touch and up to date, learning from others, faster resolution/problem solving, better collaboration, and feedback. Although socialising was revealed to be a strong overall theme , it also demonstrated lower importance ratings. Other themes revealed through the analysis are provided in Table 4-3. Table 4-3 Data Analysis Results for Question 2: Main Advantages of Frequent Interaction Invariant Constituent Overall number (Frequency) By Rating 5=Most important n=513 5 4 3 2 1 Knowledge sharing/exchange of information/Knowledge transfer 149 75 39 19 12 4 Staying in touch/up to date/ more info on projects and processes 113 58 28 17 8 2 Socializing/social interaction 74 5 10 35 18 6 Learning/learning from others/learning new things/increased knowledge base 72 17 28 14 8 5 Understand problems/needs – faster resolution and quicker problem solving 70 25 24 11 4 6 Better/more efficient collaboration 67 42 8 9 5 3 Feedback/continuous feedback/early feedback 66 17 29 8 9 3 New and better ideas/flow of ideas/creativity/ brainstorming 65 25 15 14 7 4 Teamwork/being part of a team/teambuilding 51 10 12 18 9 2 Get work done/efficiency/speed 46 26 13 2 4 1 Fun 44 2 11 15 11 5 Better understanding of what others are doing and how/workloads 44 15 17 10 0 2 Everyone on same page/shared vision/focus on goals of team 32 10 9 6 5 2 Better personal contact and easy interaction 27 5 6 11 2 3 Avoid misunderstanding/work duplication 27 8 10 4 4 1 Helping others/getting help (when stuck) 26 3 9 10 3 1 Good/happy atmosphere/work environment 24 1 2 8 5 8 Networking 22 1 9 6 2 4 Motivate each other/inspiration 21 5 1 5 8 2 Other/new perspectives/viewpoints 18 2 10 3 1 2 Improving quality of work/performance 16 1 5 9 1 0 Work synchronization 16 2 8 1 4 1 Productivity 12 3 1 4 3 1 Knowing latest news/innovations 12 0 3 2 1 6 Better communication 10 1 1 5 2 1 Question 3: Individuals or Groups that are Dependent on Frequent Interaction Table 4-4 provides high frequency invariant constituents (relevant responses) given by survey participants demonstrating themes within the data for Question 3. Thematically, the analysis revealed the following elements representing the primary perceptions of participants in terms of individuals or groups that are dependent on frequent interaction of the participant: (a) my team/project teammates/peers; and (b) managers. The first theme demonstrated a high frequency of importance ratings with a moderate percentage of ‘most important’ and ‘important’ ratings (rating 5 and 4, respectively). Although the theme of managers was revealed to be a relatively strong overall theme, it also demonstrated lower importance ratings. Other themes revealed through the analysis are shown in Table 4-4. Table 4-4 Data Analysis Results for Question 3: Individual/groups dependent on frequent interaction of participant Invariant Constituent Overall number (Frequency) By Rating 5=Most important n=513 5 4 3 2 1 My team/project teammates/peers 128 87 19 14 3 5 Managers/PMs 48 4 24 11 6 3 Users/customers/clients 35 7 12 10 4 2 All reports/related teams 34 7 17 4 4 2 Engineering teams (various) 28 18 8 2 0 0 Recruiting team/staffing 17 5 3 6 3 0 Geo Teams 15 7 6 2 0 0 Operations teams 14 2 3 5 2 2 All of them 11 9 1 0 1 0 HQ 11 3 3 1 2 2 Other engineers using my project/peer developers of my tool 10 1 5 3 1 0 Question 4: Factors Facilitating Easy Interaction Table 4-5 provides high frequency invariant constituents (relevant responses) by survey participants demonstrating themes within the data for Question 4. Thematically, the analysis revealed the following elements representing the primary perceptions of participants about factors that facilitate easy interaction: (a) common, proximal, and open workspace areas; (b) common functional areas; (c) sufficient and available meeting facilities; (d) excellent communication tools; and (e) video conference facilities. The theme of open and common workspace areas/shared office space demonstrated a high frequency of importance ratings with a very large percentage of ‘most important’ ratings (rating 5). Other revealed themes, particularly the second listed theme, demonstrated relatively high overall frequency, but these themes did not demonstrate the strength of importance that the first theme did. Other themes and invariant constituents revealed through the analysis are shown in Table 4-5. Table 4-5 Data Analysis Results for Question 4: Factors Facilitating Easy Interaction Invariant Constituent Overall number (Frequency) By Rating 5=Most important n=513 5 4 3 2 1 Open and Common workspace areas/shared office space/desk locations/sitting together 175 103 34 25 9 4 Common shared Areas (e.g., Kitchen, play/game rooms, lounges, library, etc.) 173 40 66 42 17 8 Enough facilities for meetings/availability of meeting and conference areas 90 19 27 30 12 2 Great communication tools (email, VC, chats, dist. Lists, online docs, wireless, VPN, mobile†¦) 80 11 30 14 18 7 Video Conference meeting rooms/facilities 78 19 25 18 12 4 Onsite lunch/dinner/common dining area (free food and eating together) 50 7 15 11 13 4 Whiteboard areas for informal meetings 43 10 18 7 7 1 Corporate culture/open culture/ open communication culture 43 18 11 9 3 2 Email 42 11 13 9 5 4 Casual and social environment/open atmosphere 36 19 5 9 2 1 People: easy going, friendly, smart, knowledgeable, willing to help 35 14 9 3 3 6 Social Events 28 3 6 5 7 7 Company calendar/planned ops for meeting/ scheduled meetings 19 3 7 6 2 1 Geographic co-location/same time zone 13 7 4 2 0 0 Travel/trips to other offices 12 1 2 1 3 5 Chat (non-specific text or in person) 11 2 4 3 0 2 IM/internet chat 10 5 1 1 1 2 MOMA/social networking/wiki pages/company docs 10 1 0 3 4 2 Question 5: Factors Inhibiting Interaction with Others Table 4-6 provides high frequency invariant constituents (relevant responses) by survey participants demonstrating themes within the data for Question 5. Thematically, the analysis revealed a single strong element and several elements with less relevance as inhibiting factors. The physical geographic differences – specifically the time zone differences – were noted by a majority of participants as the most important element that inhibited interaction with others. Study participants perceived their overscheduled and busy work lives, noise levels in their workspaces, and shared work environments to be contributing inhibitory factors with regard to interaction with others. These elements also demonstrated high frequencies of importance ratings with a moderate percentage of ‘most important’ ratings (rating 5). Other themes revealed through the analysis are shown in Table 4-6. Table 4-6 Data Analysis Results for Question 5: Factors Inhibiting Interaction with Others Invariant Constituent Overall number (Frequency) By Rating 5=Most important n=513 5 4 3 2 1 Physical Geographic distance/ timezone differences 164 115 36 9 3 1 Very busy/Overscheduled people/ overbooked calendars/ too many meetings 45 17 16 10 2 0 Crowded/noisy environment/ noise in shared space 33 19 6 4 4 0 Defective VCs/ VC suboptimal/ VC equipment not working 25 9 7 7 2 0 No meeting rooms available 22 8 6 6 2 0 Too few VC rooms in some locations / lack of available VC rooms 19 4 9 5 0 1 Open Space: no privacy, interruptions/ disruptions 19 5 8 3 2 1 Information overload/ too much email 15 6 2 6 1 0 Large office building/building size and layout/ too many people, difficult to find people 15 11 4 0 0 0 Team split between multiple sites or large distance between team members in same bldg 15 4 5 4 2 0 Need more whiteboards/lack of informal areas with whiteboards 11 3 5 2 1 0 Language barrier: lack of correct English/not knowing colloquial lang. or nuances 11 5 1 3 1 1 Lack of time/deadlines 11 5 2 1 2 1 Different working hours within same time zone 10 5 3 2 0 0 Discussion Both the literature and the survey have illuminated interesting facets of the work environment and the need for personal communication. The analysis of the 513 participants’ responses to five open-ended questions from the employee perception survey revealed patterns of facilitating and inhibiting factors in their work environment. Nonaka (2011) clearly illustrates this point with the argument that the communal environment promotes a standard of communication not found in the technological alternatives. Further, the shift away from the organization to the person orientation provides a fundamental benefit to every employee (Becker 2004). With a rising recognition of individual value, the organisation is building employee trust. Participants in this study preferred frequent, informal opportunities for the exchange of knowledge. The opportunity for growth was centred on the capacity to exchange concepts in a free and easy manner (Nonaka 2011). The evidence presented in this study demonstrates that these opportunities were more valued by team members with high knowledge exchange needs. This is line with the increased depth of knowledge and ability to meet technical needs through employee communication (Tallman et al 2010). A combination of professional advice can benefit the entire production and development process. In this study, transactions among participants were often brief, and were perceived to require limited space – often just stand-up space – with noise-regulating options not found in open-office environments. Dakir (2012) demonstrates the environment has the potential to add to or detract from employee communication, making this factor a critical consideration. Spontaneous and opportunistic knowledge-sharing transactions were valued, and technology provided a platform for this type of knowledge exchange to occur. This evidence from the survey corresponds with the literature illustrating that increased communication and sharing in the workplace enhances the entire operation, as well as providing new and fresh opportunities and innovations (Tallman et al 2010). The research at Google provides further support for the view of some leading companies who strongly believe that having workers in the same place is crucial to their success (Noorderhaven et al 2009). Yahoo’s CEO Marissa Mayer communicated via a memo to employees that June 2013, any existing work-from-home arrangements will no longer apply. Initial studies theorized that the work at home system would provide a better platform for workers, even on a local level (Dakir 2012).   Many points of the memo cited in this Yahoo example, parallel the literature presented in this study. Her memo stated (Moyer 2013): â€Å"To become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side-by-side.† This is clearly in line with the Coehen and Prusak (2001) assertion that the physical workplace is a critical element of the dynamic business.   â€Å"That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices. Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings.† This element of the her reasoning is nearly identical to the argument presented by Dakir (2012), that a successful company do so, in part, by promoting communication and teamwork in the office, the technical alternatives are not enough. â€Å"Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home. We need to be one Yahoo!, and that starts with physically being together†¦.Being a Yahoo isnt just about your day-to-day job, it is about the interactions and experiences that are only possible in our offices† (Moyer 2013). This section is directly in line with emerging studies citing the vital nature of the interaction and face to face employee contact (Heerwagen et al. 2004). This study has clearly demonstrated that Mayer is not alone in her thinking; Steve Jobs operated in a similar fashion as well (Davenport et al 2002). Despite being a denizen of the digital world, or maybe because he knew all too well its isolating potential, Jobs was a strong believer in face-to-face meetings. â€Å"There’s a temptation in our networked age to think that ideas can be developed by email and iChat,† he said. â€Å"That’s crazy. Creativity comes from spontaneous meetings, from random discussions. You run into someone, you ask what they’re doing, you say ‘Wow,’ and soon you’re cooking up all sorts of ideas† (Isaacson, 2011, p. 431). This assertion by Jobs closely resembles the argument presented in the Rhoads (2010) study that found a clear correlation between the communication capacity and opportunity for successful innovation and progress. Following this philosophy led Jobs to have the Pixar building designed to pr omote encounters and unplanned collaborations.   Ã‚  Mayers former colleague at Google agrees (Ibid). Speaking at an event in Sydney February 2013, Google CFO Patrick Pichette said that teleworking is not encouraged at Google. This reflects the consensus that is emerging that time in the office is not only valuable but necessary to sustained competition in the industry (Denstadli et al 2013). Pichette believes that working from home could isolate employees from other staff. Companies like Apple, Yahoo! and Google are holding on to (or have started embracing) the belief that having workers in the same place is crucial to their success (Dakir 2012). This appears to be based on the view that physical proximity can lead to casual exchanges, which in turn can lead to breakthroughs for products. Heerwagen et al (2004) illustrates that it is evident that â€Å"knowledge work is a highly cognitive and social activity†.   Non-verbal communication is complex and involves many unconscious mechanisms e.g. gesture, body language, posture, facial expression, eye contact, pheromones, proxemics, chronemics, haptics, and paralanguage (Denstadli et al 2013). So, although virtual interaction can be valuable it is not a replacement for face-to-face interaction, particularly for initial meetings of individuals or teams. Furthermore, the increase in remote working has indicated that face-to-face interaction is important for motivation, team-building, mentoring, a se nse of belonging and loyalty, arguably more so than in place-centred workgroups (Deprez and Tissen 2009). Conclusion The role of knowledge management in the workplace has become an increasingly valuable segment of a company’s resources.   This study examined the practice of working remotely versus employee interaction in the work place providing many illuminating developments. Despite the early optimism that emerging technology was going to provide the end all to employee work habits have proven less than fully realized. The evidence in this study has continuously illustrated an environment that requires the innovative, face to face interaction in order to maintain a competitive edge in the industry.   Further, the very environment that promotes this free exchange of ideals is not adequately substituted by technology.   In short, the evidence provided in this study has clearly demonstrated the advantage that the in house employee has over the remote worker. The impromptu encounters between employees are very often the elements needed for progress. What is clear is that in order for a business to capitalize on their full range of available resources virtually requires, face to face personal interaction in order to fully realize the firms full potential.   In the end, it will be the combination of leadership, teamwork and innovation that provides business with the best environment, not necessarily how much technology is available. References Dalkir, K. 2005.  Knowledge management in theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann. Denstadli, J., Gripsrud, M., Hjorthol, R. and Julsrud, T. 2013. Videoconferencing and business air travel: Do new technologies produce new interaction patterns?.  Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 29 pp. 113. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 2011. The wise leader.  Harvard Business Review, 89 (5), pp. 5867. Noorderhaven, N. and Harzing, A. 2009. Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs.Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (5), pp. 719741. Rhoads, M. 2010. Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication: What Does Theory Tell Us and What Have We Learned so Far?.  Journal of Planning Literature, 25 (2), pp. 111122. Tallman, S. and Chacar, A. 2011. Knowledge Accumulation and Dissemination in MNEs: A Practice-Based Framework.  Journal of Management Studies, 48 (2), pp. 278304.

Quotations About Endangered Species

Quotations About Endangered Species People all around the world are talking about endangered species. Opinions circulate, facts are figured, and tempers have been known to flare. It becomes an interesting study to learn not only what makes a species endangered, but how people react to these species predicaments and what might be done to protect them The following is a list quotes by politicians, actors, authors, and other well-known public figures who, in one way or another, have felt a need to speak up on the issue of endangered species conservation. Notable Quotes Lawrence Anthony Workable solutions for Earth are urgently needed. Saving seals and tigers, or fighting yet another oil pipeline through a wilderness area, while laudable, is merely shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic. Norm Dicks The Endangered Species Act is the strongest and most effective tool we have to repair the environmental harm that is causing a species to decline. Yao Ming Endangered species are our friends. Martin Jenkins, Can We Save the Tiger? When it comes to looking after all the species that are already endangered, theres such a lot to do that sometimes it might all seem to be too much, especially when there are so many other important things to worry about. But if we stop trying, the chances are that pretty soon well end up with a world where there are no tigers or elephants, or sawfishes or whooping cranes, or albatrosses or ground iguanas. And I think that would be a shame, dont you? Jay Inslee What is a fish without a river? What is a bird without a tree to nest in? What is an Endangered Species Act without any enforcement mechanism to ensure their habitat is protected? It is nothing. Bruce Babbitt Well, I think [Im most proud of] breathing life into the Endangered Species Act, taking those wolves back into Yellowstone, restoring the salmon in the rivers of the Pacific Northwest. Id say thats at the top. Alex Meraz Actually I do support a charity, Defenders of Wildlife. They help protect endangered species. Aldo Leopold, Sand County Almanac If education really educates, there will, in time, be more and more citizens who understand that relics of the old West add meaning and value to the new. Youth yet unborn will pole up the Missouri with Lewis and Clark, or climb the Sierras with James Capen Adams, and each generation, in turn, will ask: Where is the big white bear? It will be a sorry answer to say he went under while conservationists werent looking. Jack Hanna The snow leopard is absolutely magnificent. It represents really what endangered species are all about. Jim Saxton It is a drastic mistake to eliminate the provisions that have to do with the protection of habitat for endangered species. It is my opinion that the Endangered Species Act is 99 percent about protecting critical habitat. Dave Barry The real threat to whales is whaling, which has endangered many whale species. Steve Irwin Take the crocodile, for example, my favorite animal. There are 23 species. Seventeen of those species are rare or endangered. Theyre on the way out, no matter what anyone does or says, you know. Russell Banks Chimpanzees are endangered. Severely. Charles Clover, The End of the Line: How Overfishing Is Changing the World and What We Eat Celebrity chefs are the leaders in the field of food, and we are the led. Why should the leaders of chemical businesses be held responsible for polluting the marine environment with a few grams of effluent, which is sublethal to marine species, while celebrity chefs are turning out endangered fish at several dozen tables a night without enduring a syllable of criticism? Bill Vaughan The whale is endangered, while the ant continues to do just fine. Source Clover, Charles. End of the Line: How Overfishing Is Changing the World and What We Eat. Paperback, Ebury, March 1, 2005.

International finance Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

International finance - Essay Example receiving 51.5 million USD, it is forced to pay 1 million USD to the counterparty to settle the forward and this means it will only keep (51.5 million – 1 million) = 50.5 million USD. The company would have gained if the rate went against the forward rate by an equal margin of 0.02 USD/Euro. A forward contract essentially locks in the exchange rate, no matter what happens, and depending on which way the market subsequently moves it can be beneficial or detrimental. (a) Intrinsic value of a call option may be calculated as; In the case of a Call Option:  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Underlying Price  - Strike Price = Intrinsic Value. Therefore, the intrinsic values of the stocks priced at $55, $50, $45 will be as follows; As can be observed from the table, the intrinsic value of the call option with a strike of $50 remains at zero until the stock starts to trade above the strike price. The call intrinsic value is greater than zero; therefore, it rises and continues rising as the stock starts to move away from the strike price to the upside. Which is; (0.06-0.05)*(90/360)*1 million = $2,500. This interest saving of 2,500 will not come until the end of the 90-day LIBOR or Loan period. Therefore, the value at settlement is calculated from the present value of these savings; If the floating rate happens to be less than the forward rate, the result will be, negative meaning the long will pay the short; this also happens when the current rate is less than the contract rate (Scott & Wellons 1995). Hence, money may be lost since borrowing could only technically take place at lower rate with the present rates than it is possible with contract rates. (a) The annual interest rate in the UK is 6.5% while that in the US is 5.2%; the interest rate in the US is lower than that in the UK by (6.5-5.2) = 1.3%. A reduction or lower interest rate will mean that the demand for US goods will be lower as compared to those of the UK goods by a percentage of 1.3%. This means a depreciation of the